Issue - meetings

Construction of single storey side/rear extension.

Permit (both applications)

Mr Power introduced the application. 

Additional information was provided on the agenda update sheet regarding a number of corrections to the report and omissions from the report relating to the conditions and informatives.

The following member of the public addressed the Committee:

Mr Jonathan Stern – applicant

During the discussion Members debated whether blinds should be a requirement, the contemporary design of the extension and if it was contrary to the guidance within the Neighbourhood Plan (NP), the weight apportioned to the NP, and the applicant’s commitment to comply with officer advice.  Mr Whitty confirmed that cognitive account is always taken of the NP, which provides a broad policy for interpretation citing Policy DS3 which refers to ‘Housing Extensions Style and Vernacular’.  Mr Boardway advised that at pre-application stage the inspector had provided a clear indication of what was acceptable, and contemporary architecture had the advantage of being able to create smaller structures.  Mr Broadway added that the rear view of the building showed some earlier rebuilding, including windows from the 1930s and 1940s, and the location at the rear was the most appropriate for an extension, and the planning inspector did not favour a side extension.  The current proposal had reduced the size from the original proposal, and had less visual impact, with a flat roof, of good quality, low profile finish.

Members further debated the importance of CDC working with parish councils to ensure appropriate communication, and sought further clarification regarding the roof and the potential for a green-roof and solar panels.  Mr Whitty confirmed the roof would be constructed with zinc and a lantern for which there was a condition for blinds, and that the installation of a green roof would require significant bulk and weight which would not be appropriate.  It would also not be reasonable to require solar panels on an extension, which would if installed, also have a negative impact on a listed building. With regard to working with Parish Councils, Mr Whitty confirmed that Parish Councils had been offered a conversation with the case officer on any application and that officers were keen to foster good working relationships.

Recommendation to Permit application WR/19/02700/DOM as set out on the update sheet.

Recommendation to Permit application WR/19/02701/LBC with condition 4 to be omitted as set out on the update sheet.

The Committee took a five minute break.