Venue: Committee Room 1 East Pallant House
Contact: Graham Thrussell on 01243 534653 Email: email@example.com
Any apologies for absence which have been received will be noted at this stage.
There will be announced at this stage any urgent items which, due to special circumstances, will be dealt with as late items under agenda item 7.
Mrs Hardwick welcomed everyone present, which included Mr L J Macey (one of the Chichester South ward members) who was present as an observer.
Save for Mrs Hardwick and Mrs Tassell, each of the Chichester District Council (CDC) members were new to the Standards Committee (SC). Mr Ribbens, one of the two current parish representatives (Plaistow and Ifold Parish Council), and Mr Plytas, one of CDC’s two independent persons, were incumbents in their respective positions.
All CDC members of the SC were present.
Apologies for absence had been received from Ms Kenney, the other current parish representative (Hunston Parish Council), and Mr Newman, the other independent person.
The press was not in attendance at this meeting, which was the SC’s first meeting of the 2015-2019 Chichester District Council administration.
The emergency evacuation procedure was explained.
There were no urgent items for consideration under agenda item 7 (Late Items).
Insofar as the subsisting parish representative vacancy was concerned (Mr J Cottam (Fernhurst Parish Council) was no longer a parish councillor), Mrs Hardwick intimated that an attempt would be made at the forthcoming All Parishes Meeting on Wednesday 30 September 2015 to secure nominations for or at least expressions of interest in that position. In recent years it had been difficult to fill vacancies and this meeting would be an ideal opportunity to address the situation. It was felt that all three co-opted positions should be offered for nominations; Ms Kenney and Mr Ribbens were most welcome to stand for re-appointment.
The Standards Committee will be asked to approve the minutes of the previous meeting which took place on Monday 6 June 2011.
The SC, unlike its two sub-committees the Assessment Sub-Committee and the Hearing Sub-Committee, had met only once during the 2011-2015 CDC administration. Mrs Tassell was the only one of the current SC members who had also sat on the SC during that period.
Mrs Tassell and Mr Ribbens had not attended the SC’s previous meeting on Monday 6 June 2011.
Accordingly none of the current CDC members was present at that meeting but in considering the minutes thereof for approval and signing (in accordance with standing order 4.3 of CDC’s Constitution) no-one had any reason to doubt the accuracy of those minutes and it was agreed that Mrs Hardwick should sign and date the same without amendment.
That the minutes of the meeting of the Standards Committee which took place on Monday 6 June 2011 shall be approved without amendment and signed and dated accordingly.
Declarations of Interests
Members are to make any declarations of disclosable pecuniary, personal and/or prejudicial interests which they might have in respect of matters on the agenda for this meeting.
There were no declarations of interests made at this meeting.
Public Question Time
Questions submitted by members of the public in writing by 12:00 noon on the previous working day namely Wednesday 9 September 2015 (the maximum time allowed is 15 minutes)
No public questions had been submitted.
The Standards Committee is asked to note the attached terms of reference and to consider in the light of them whether there are any matters not listed on this agenda which it wishes to discuss at this meeting.
The SC considered its terms of reference as they appeared in Part 3 of CDC’s Constitution (pages 59 and 60) circulated with the agenda (copy attached to the official minutes).
In view of this being the first meeting of the new CDC administration, the terms of reference had been included for noting. The SC was asked whether in the light of those terms of reference there were any matters not listed on the agenda which it wished to consider at this meeting
There was no presentation or discussion of the terms of reference.
The SC did not request any additional items for consideration at this meeting.
That the Standards Committee notes its terms of reference as set out in Part 3 of the Constitution of Chichester District Council.
The Standards Committee is requested to consider the agenda report and its appendix and to recommend to the Council that the Council’s Arrangements for Dealing with Standards Allegations under the Localism Act 2011 is amended as shown in the appendix and that the Monitoring Officer is given all delegated powers specified therein.
The SC considered (a) the agenda report written by the Monitoring Officer and the appendix thereto namely the proposed amendments to CDC’s Arrangements for Dealing with Standards Allegations under the Localism Act 2011 circulated with the agenda and (b) a revised version of the appendix containing further changes resulting from a discussion between Mrs Hardwick and the Monitoring Officer (copies of (a) and (b) attached to the official minutes).
Miss Golding presented the agenda report and the revised version of the proposed amendments appendix.
Miss Golding pointed out that the date in the top right-hand corner of the first page of the revised appendix should be altered to read ’10.09.15’ instead of ’27.08.15’.
Miss Golding first of all summarised the statistics set out in paras 5.1 to 5.3 inclusive.
With respect to the proposed amendments, Miss Golding highlighted the following:
(1) The addition of a sentence in the penultimate para of section 3 of the Arrangements stating that a copy of any response made by the subject member would be sent to the complainant (paras 5.8 and 5.9 of the report refer). The right to see such responses had recently been raised by a complainant after her complaint had been considered by the Assessment Sub-Committee (ASC) although the Monitoring Officer was already mindful of the case for making this reform. This would give the complainant the right of reply prior to the initial assessment.
(2) The main change was to include a new section 4 dealing with validation. The rationale for this was addressed in paras 5.4 to 5.7 inclusive of the report; the text had been refined as a result of a discussion between Miss Golding and Mrs Hardwick. The aim of the validation section was to avoid the complaints procedure being invoked in respect of the exchange of views, comments and opinions during the conduct of Council-related business eg at a Planning Committee meeting. It was not, however, intended to exclude complaints about how a member eg the chairman of a planning committee was alleged to have treated someone during a meeting. The incorporation of the validation section would avoid the need for the Monitoring Officer in those cases to have to consult an independent person.
(3) In the newly numbered section 5 (previously 4) – there was the need for consequential renumbering throughout the document as a result of the new validation section - there were some general textual refinements and an additional (fourth) potential reason for the Monitoring Officer deciding that a complaint should not proceed to the ASC stage. As stated in the Arrangements the list was not exhaustive.
(4) In Appendix 3 (Hearings Procedure) to the Arrangements the final sentence of the second para within the ‘The Hearing Sub-Committee’ (HSC) section was deleted in order to remove the bar on the same independent person being involved at both the ASC and HSC stages. There had been no such bar in the case of the parish representative.
Mrs Hardwick referred to the standards training session ... view the full minutes text for item 6.
The Standards Committee will consider any late items as follows:
(a) Items added to the agenda papers and made available for public inspection
(b) Items which the chairman has agreed should be taken as matters of urgency by reason of special circumstances to be reported at the meeting
As recorded in the seventh para of minute 1 and the fourth para of minute 5, there were no late items for consideration at this meeting.
Exclusion of the Press and Public
There are no restricted items for consideration.
There were no restricted items for consideration at this meeting so as to require exclusion of the press and public.